Structure and selected properties of Al

Scientific Reports volume 12, Article number: 14194 (2022) Cite this article

1246 Accesses

1 Citations

Metrics details

The aim of the study was to supplement the data on the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy with binary phase structure and the Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy with multiphase structure prepared with two different cooling rates from the liquid state. The presence of the structurally complex Al65Cr27Fe8 phase was confirmed by neutron diffraction, scanning electron microscopy with the analysis of chemical composition and transmission electron microscopy. Additionally, the Al8Cr5 phase with γ-brass structure was identified for Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy in both cooling rates from the liquid state. Due to the interesting features of structurally complex alloys, the wear resistance, magnetic properties, and corrosion products after performing electrochemical tests were examined. Based on pin-on-disc measurements, a lower friction coefficient was observed for the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy (µ ≈ 0.55) compared to the Al71Cr24Fe5 multiphase alloy (µ ≈ 0.6). The average hardness of the binary phase Al65Cr20Fe5 alloy (HV0.1 = 917 ± 30) was higher compared to the multiphase Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy (HV0.1 = 728 ± 34) and the single phase Al–Cr–Fe alloys described in the literature. Moreover, the beneficial effect of rapid solidification on hardness was demonstrated. The alloys Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 showed paramagnetic behavior, however rapidly solidified Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy indicated an increase of magnetic properties. The studied alloys were characterized by the presence of passive layers after electrochemical tests. A higher amount of oxides on the surface of the Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy was recorded due to the positive effect of chromium on the stabilization of the passive layer.

Complex metallic alloys (CMAs) are intermetallic crystalline compounds. CMAs are composed of structurally complex alloy phases (SCAPs)1. They are characterized by large unit cells that can be made up of thousands of atoms. Crystals that contain several dozen atoms in their cell2, quasicrystals, and their approximants3 are considered SCAP-type structures. Complex metallic alloys indicate interesting physicochemical properties, such as high hardness, low friction coefficient, and good corrosion resistance4,5. Moreover, SCAPs free from structure defects can be characterized by a high degree of magnetic order6. The set of unique characteristics of alloys with the structurally complex structure results from differences in the transport of electrons and phonons due to the different atomic structures of classical crystal lattices2,7. The main limitations for the development of this group of materials is the manufacturing of structurally complex single-phase alloys and the computational and theoretical resources for their description6. Based on physicochemical properties, complex metallic alloys have potential applications as thermoelectric, catalytic, and structural materials (among others, in high-load satellite parts)3,5,6. CMAs could be applied in composites or as coating materials due to the reduced friction coefficient4,5,8.

The Al–Cr–Fe, Al–Cu–Fe and Al–Cu–Fe–Cr alloys were classified as CMAs due to the presence of a structurally complex alloy phases4. The occurrence of γ-brass phases was often observed during the preparation of quasicrystals and their approximants in Al–Cr9,10, Al–Cr–Fe2,4,8,11,12,13,14, Al–Cu15,16, and Al–Cu–Cr17,18 chemical compositions12. Dong9 stated that the γ-brass phases are approximations to quasicrystals. Similarly, Veys et al.19 indicated that the phase of Al65Cr27Fe8 is a CMA compound with γ-brass structure that can be considered as an approximant of quasicrystalline icosahedral and decagonal phases. In other publications4,11, the alloys Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1 and Al66.9Cu11.6Fe11.6Cr10.6 of structurally complex alloys were produced by hot sintering powders in the form of rolls with a diameter of 20 mm and then subjected to heat treatment. Based on the X-ray diffraction analysis, the Al8Cr5 phase was identified for the Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1 alloy and Al6.5Cr0.5Cu2Fe phase for the Al66.9Cu11.6Fe11.6Cr10.6 alloy. The authors11 concluded that the Al8Cr5 phase (γ-brass) is isostructural with the Al65Cr27Fe8 phase.

The purpose of the work was to provide detailed structural studies of the Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys produced with two different cooling rates from the liquid state. In addition to the earlier work20, these alloys have not been described in terms of structure so far. Moreover, there is still a few experimental data that confirm the interesting properties of Al–Cr–Fe alloys with the CMAs, especially with binary and multiphase structure4,5. The results of the selected properties such as wear resistance, hardness, magnetic behavior, and chemical composition of the surface after corrosion were analyzed.

Chemical elements of Al, Cr, and Fe with a purity of 99.99% were melted in an induction furnace with appropriate atomic fractions (Al71Cr24Fe5 and Al65Cr20Fe15 at.%) in a protective argon atmosphere in corundum crucibles (Φ = 30 mm, H = 45 mm) and then Ar-cooled. Ingots produced with a weight of 50 g were remelted and cast with an increased cooling rate from a liquid state under pressure (high-pressure die casting method with a cooling rate ~ 103 K/s) to a water-cooled copper mold (90 × 80 × 45 mm) in the form of plates (30 × 10 × 1 mm). X-ray diffraction, light microscopy observations, Mössbauer spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and electrochemical measurements were described for these alloys in an earlier publication20.

Neutron diffraction studies were performed on the MTEST neutron powder diffractometer at the Budapest Neutron Center. The Cu(111) monochromator was used which selected neutrons with a wavelength of λ = 0.1446 nm. The measured 2θ range was between 10° and 140°. This setup allowed a sufficient q-range and resolution for the identification of different phases present in the samples.

Observations of an ingot structure were made using scanning electron microscopy in backscattered electron (BSE) mode (Supra 35, Carl Zeiss) with EDX analysis to identify maps with the chemical composition of phases.

High resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) was used to determine electron diffraction from the selected area (SAED), structure, and morphology using S/TEM TITAN 80–300. Samples for HRTEM observations were powdered.

Coercive force (Hc) and saturation magnetization (Ms) were determined from changes of magnetization as a function of the magnetic fields up to 10 kOe. Magnetic properties were recorded using a LakeShore 7307 vibrating sample magnetometer.

Tribological tests were performed using the pin-on-disc method using CSM Instruments. The experiments were carried out on cylindrical ingots with a radius of 26 mm and a height of 3 mm. The radius of the wear track was 8 mm. A ball made of 100C6 steel with a diameter of 6 mm was used as a counter-sample. The linear speed was 0.01 m/s and a load of 10 N was applied. Observations of the wear tracks, together with measurements of their width after tribological tests, were carried out by scanning electron microscope (Supra 35, Carl Zeiss). Hardness tests were performed using a Future Tech FM-700 Vickers hardness testing instrument with a load of 100 g for 15 s.

The corrosion products on the surface of the Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 samples in the form of plates after corrosion tests in 3.5% NaCl solution at 25 °C were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Depth profile mode (DP-XPS) using a Physical Electronics (PHI 5700/660) spectrometer working under an ultra-high vacuum (10−9 Torr) in UHV cluster and a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (1486.6 eV) was used. Both tested samples were initially kept pre-chamber held under vacuum (10−8 Torr) for at least 1 h, next transferred to the measurement chamber and analyzed. The survey spectra were measured with a pass energy of 187.85 eV. Depth profile (DP-XPS) analysis was carried out using a focused 1.5 kV Ar+ beam for 15 min, sputtering in intervals between measurements. Core-level lines collected in the DP-XPS analysis were measured with a pass energy of 23.5 eV. All obtained XPS data was analyzed using MultiPak 9.7 software, which contains an internal reference database and compared to the NIST XPS database.

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Based on the phase analysis provided by the XRD method presented in20, the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy was characterized by a binary phase structure (ingot: Al65Cr27Fe8 (SCAP) + Al12.59Fe6.41, plate: Al65Cr27Fe8 (SCAP) + Al5.6Fe2), and the Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy, a multiphase (ingot: Cr + Al65Cr27Fe8 (SCAP) + Al8.26Cr4.74 + Al2Cr + Fe2CrAl + Al8Cr5 + Al45Cr7, plate: Cr + Al65Cr27Fe8 (SCAP) + Al8.26Cr4.74 + Al2Cr + Fe2CrAl + Al8Cr5 + Al45Cr7). The presence of the identified phases in the structure for the ingots was confirmed by the analysis of the neutron diffractograms in Fig. 1. The presence of the Fe2CrAl and Cr phases was excluded for Al71Cr24Fe5 due to the small number of matched reflections. Furthermore, observations were carried out using scanning electron microscopy in BSE mode with the EDX analysis presented in Fig. 2 for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Fig. 3 for Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys. SEM observations confirmed the presence of two phases in the structure of the Al65Cr20Fe5 alloy. The presented EDX maps allow us to suppose that the alloy matrix was constituted by the Al65Cr27Fe8 (SCAP) phase, while the role of reinforcing phase was played by Al12.59Fe6.41. Identification of individual phases of the Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy was difficult due to the presence of many phases. However, iron-rich areas were identified suggesting the presence of the Al65Cr20Fe8 (SCAP) phase. The Al–Cr phases formed a dendritic structure.

ND patterns of Al65Cr20Fe15 (a) and Al71Cr24Fe5 (b) alloys in a form of ingot.

EDX maps of Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy in a form of ingot.

EDX maps of Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy in a form of ingot.

In addition, studies with the use of transmission electron microscopy, presented in Figs. 4 and 5, were carried out. The presence of two phases in the structure of the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy and multiple phases in Al71Cr24Fe5 was confirmed by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns from the areas of Figs. 4a and 5a. TEM investigations were performed for samples in a form of plate. SAED analysis confirmed the ND results. The Inverse Fourier Transform (IFT) images also show areas with an ordered structure of atoms, characteristic of crystalline structures. The interplanar spacings in the marked crystalline areas were d = 0.458 nm (Fig. 4b) and d = 0.368 nm (Fig. 5b). The revealed values of the d spacings were found to closely with the interplanar spacings of the Al65Cr27Fe8 phase.

HRTEM image (a), IFT image (b) and SAED patterns (c) of Al65Cr20Fe15 plate.

HRTEM image (a), IFT image (b) and SAED patterns (c) of Al71Cr24Fe5 plate.

Al–Cr–Fe alloys were described in the literature primarily in terms of the formation of structurally complex phases. Ura-Binczyk et al.4,11 studied a polycrystalline alloy of Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1, which was produced by hot press sintering of the intermetallic powders and heat treated. The authors11 pointed out that γ-Al8Cr5 phase identified by XRD is isostructural with Al65Cr27Fe5. In this study, the Al65Cr27Fe6 phase had lattice parameters a = b = 12.6963 and c = 7.9211 and the angles between them α = β = 90° and γ = 120° in the hexagonal notation, which is consistent with the data reported in the articles11,16. According to report presented by Veys et al.19 the phase of Al65Cr27Fe8 has γ-brass structure and is isostructural to cubic Al9Cr4 (with lattice parameters a = 9.4 Å).

In this work, for the multiphase Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy, the Al8Cr5 phase was also identified for both cooling rates. The lattice parameters of which a = b = c = 7.8050 and α = β = γ = 109.127° correspond to the α-Al8Cr5 phase, which corresponds to the rhombohedral system. The parameters of the unitary lattice cell are consistent with the description12. According to10,12,21, the Al8Cr5 phase with a rhombohedral structure has a γ-brass structure.

Additionally, the results were compared with a study in which Al–Cr–Fe based alloys were cast13. Two phases were marked in the SEM image for the Al66Fe22Cr12 alloy: α-Al8Cr5 and Al5Fe2. The microstructure is similar to that shown in Fig. 2 for Al65Cr20Fe1513.

Many researchers study the surface properties of complex metallic alloys because of the specific electronic structure associated with high symmetry clusters and unit cells made of thousands of atoms. Quasicrystals, which are included in the group of complex metallic alloys, are characterized by a low coefficient of friction and high wear resistance2. To describe abrasion resistance, tribological tests using the pin-on-disc method were performed. The test measurements with the parameters described in article22 were carried out, however, no clearly signs of wear were observed, due to the low linear speed 0.05 m/s and the distance 8 m as well as relatively low load (FN = 2 N). We used the parameters described in23. Figure 6 presents a graph of the dependence of the friction coefficient on the distance, which was recorded during the pin-on-disc for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 in the form of ingots. It could be observed that the friction coefficient decreased to values of approximately 0.46 (Al65Cr20Fe15) and 0.5 (Al71Cr24Fe5) in the initial stage of the study. The gradual increase was visible after a distance of 25 m, stabilization occurred, in which the mean value of the coefficient of friction was 0.6 for Al71Cr24Fe5 and 0.55 for Al65Cr20Fe15. Based on the measurements conducted, it is visible that the Al65Cr20Fe15 binary phase alloy was characterized by a lower friction coefficient compared to the Al71Cr24Fe5 multiphase alloy.

Pin-on-disc curves of Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 (ingots) as the relation of friction coefficient in the function of sliding distance.

The results of pin-on-disc tests were also described in24, which compared the Al–Cu–Fe–Cr and Al–Cu–Fe alloys used for the coatings. It could be compared that for the chemical composition with the addition of chromium, the friction coefficient was similar to the results described in this article for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys (µ ≈ 0.6)24. Dubois et al.25,26 compared the results of tribological tests for CMA alloys with different chemical compositions. In the publication, the orthorhombic Al–Cr–Fe and γ-Al–Cr–Fe alloys show the values of the friction coefficient in the range of 0.5 ÷ 0.6. However, it should be noted that in publications25,26 the pin-on-disc studies were carried out under vacuum. The authors25,26 noted that the characteristic friction values are lower than in the air atmosphere. This is because the oxide layer has a significant influence on the measured value of the friction coefficient. Taking into account the fact that the alloys described in our work are binary and multiphase, it could be assumed that the wear resistance is similar to the single phase alloys25,26.

Figure 7 shows the morphology of the wear tracks studied by SEM. It could be observed that three types of wear mechanisms dominated the trace of formation: plastic deformation, delamination, and oxidation. The identification of wear mechanisms was supported by the results described in paper27. Duckham et al.28 investigated the wear resistance of quasicrystalline Al–Pd–Mn and Al–Ni–Co alloys. Wear tracks were also observed after pin-on-disc tests using microscopic methods. The authors28 paid attention to the characteristic cracks that also appeared for the Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys studied. This mechanism is called by28 as the ring cracks, characteristic of brittle materials, which indicates the maximum tensile stress. The article28 also describes the partial removal of the material, which is a delamination. The publications of Dubois et al.25,26 described the phenomenon of oxidation during pin-on-disc tests caused by the air atmosphere, which was observed using SEM in the form of oxide debris. Furthermore, wear track width measurements were carried out, the mean values of which were 1.23 (± 0.05) and 1.27 (± 0.07) for the Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy, respectively. However, the literature lacks data on the width of the wear tracks for similar alloys and the same experimental conditions.

Surface morphology of the pin-on-disc friction track of (a, b) Al65Cr20Fe15, (c, d) Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys in a form of ingots.

The results of the average hardness measurements by the Vickers method together with the standard deviation for the Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys in the form of ingots and plates are presented in the form of a bar graph in Fig. 8. Al65Cr20Fe15 in the form of ingots with a binary phase structure showed an average value of 917 (± 30) HV0.1, while the multiphase Al71Cr24Fe5 728 (± 34) HV0.1. In the case of both chemical compositions, a clear effect of the application of the increased cooling rate of the liquid state was observed due to the values obtained of 943 (± 20) HV0.1 for Al65Cr20Fe15 and 802 (± 43) HV0.1 for Al71Cr24Fe5. The values obtained seem to be interesting due to the data in the comparison of the literature25,26 according to which the hardness for γ-Al–Cr–Fe is just over 700 HV. Another article2 presents the mean value of Vickers hardness for γ-Al67.6Cr23.3Fe9.1 840 (± 50) HV.

Comparison of hardness for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys in a form of ingots and plates.

According to Dubois29, quasicrystals and their approximants with good lattice excellence are characterized by diamagnetic properties in a wide range from ~ 50 K to the melting point. Among others, quasicrystalline Al-Cu-Fe alloys at the temperature of 2–300 K (− 271–27 ℃) showed diamagnetic properties30. According to the article30, the paramagnetic properties for Al–Cu–Fe alloys result from the participation of crystalline phases or structural defects. The Al86Cr8Fe631, Al61.3Cr31.1Fe7.632, Al80Cr15Fe533 alloys were characterized by paramagnetic properties. According to Bihar et al.32, in the γ-AlCrFe approximant, the iron atoms are carriers of the magnetic moments. Therefore, as a result of the presence of two and many phases in the structure of the examined alloys, magnetic tests seem to be a significant supplement to the current state of knowledge. Especially since there still exists a small amount of data on the magnetic properties of structurally complex alloys. Changes in magnetization in a function of magnetic field for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 in the form of ingots and plates were illustrated in Fig. 9. The values of saturation magnetization (Ms) and coercivity (Hc) were listed in Table 1. In numerous studies, the influence of the structure on the magnetic properties was observed. In the case of the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy, the saturation magnetization was higher for the ingot form. The relationship was opposite and a lower value was noted for the ingot of the Al71Cr24Fe5 composition. The coercivity was several times higher for the plates in both chemical compositions. It may be related to changes in the structure under the influence of the cooling rate from the liquid state. In work34 for Fe-based alloys with nanocrystalline structure, changes in coercivity resulting from grain growth after annealing were observed. In this work, the opposite phenomenon was observed because increasing casting conditions lead to fragmentation of the structure. The alloys studied showed paramagnetic properties. On the basis of the obtained results, a decrease of magnetic properties is visible along with an increase in the cooling rate from the liquid state for the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy and an increase for the Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy. Paramagnetic properties were also described in2,33 for the single phase Al80Cr15Fe5 SCAP-type alloy. Furthermore, polycrystalline, structurally complex Al86Cr6Fe631 and Al61.3Cr31.1Fe7.632 alloys were previously described in the literature as paramagnets. Based on the research conducted, it could be concluded that the presence of crystalline phases in the Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys did not change the magnetic properties at room temperature.

Magnetization (M) as a function of the magnetic field (µ0H) at room temperature for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys in a form of ingots (a) and plates (b).

The corrosion resistance of Al–Cr–Fe alloys was reported in the paper20. Electrochemical measurements of the open circuit potential as a function of time and potentiodynamic polarization curves were recorded in a 3.5% NaCl aqueous solution at a temperature of 25 °C. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests were also carried out. The electrochemical parameters, such as EOCP, Ecorr, Rp, and jcorr for studied Al-Cr-Fe alloys varied, which indicates differences in the corrosion mechanism. Among others, the Al65Cr20Fe5 alloy in the form of plate showed a corrosion potential closer to the positive values, although a higher polarization resistance was observed for the Al71Cr24Fe5 plate. Analysis of corrosion products is a useful tool to assess the corrosion behavior of materials; therefore, this article presents the results of the XPS analysis for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys in the form of plates after corrosion tests35.

The XPS survey spectra for the surface of Al65Cr20Fe15 (a) and Al71Cr24Fe5 (b) in the form of plates are presented in Fig. 10. The characteristic peaks (O1s, C1s, Al2s, Al2p, Cr2p, Cr3p) and the Auger spectrum (for O KLL and C KLL) were identified. High intensities relative to the binding energy of oxygen may indicate the formation of a passive layer in the tested plates. Figures 11 and 12 present the XPS core level lines of Al2p, Cr2p, Fe2p, O1s acquired during depth profile measurements for Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 plates, respectively. As one may notice at the surface, high binding energy Al2p and Cr2p peaks typical for oxides are evident. These results indicate the formation of a passive layer of Al2O3 and Cr2O3. Along with removing successive atomic layers by the argon beam, Al2p and Cr2p are typical for pure aluminium and chromium elements. It is worth noting that for both plate samples, the Fe2p line is typical for metallic iron with a spin–orbit splitting of about ΔE ≈ 12.8 eV. The XPS depth profiles for plates Al65Cr20Fe15 (a) and Al71Cr24Fe5 (b) are shown in Fig. 13. As the sputtering time and depth increased, the samples analyzed showed a significantly lower percentage atomic concentration of C1s, indicating the presence of carbon impurity usually accumulated on the surface. In the case of O1s, the same tendency can be noticed. Oxygen in the initial stage of sputtering may indicate the presence of oxygen, as a typical impurity on the surface that overlaps with oxygen formed by the passive layers. As successive atomic layers of the argon beam are removed and the depth of the tested material increases, the atomic concentrations of Al, Cr, and Fe are higher than at the surface.

XPS survey spectra of Al65Cr20Fe15 (a) and Al71Cr24Fe5 (b) alloys in a form of plates after corrosion tests in 3.5% NaCl solution at 25 °C.

XPS core level lines of Al2p (a), Cr2p (b), Fe2p (c), O1s (d) of Al65Cr20Fe15 plate after corrosion tests in 3.5% NaCl solution at 25 °C.

XPS core level lines of Al2p (a), Cr2p (b), Fe2p (c), O1s (d) of Al71Cr24Fe5 plate after corrosion tests in 3.5% NaCl solution at 25 °C.

DP-XPS results for Al65Cr20Fe15 (a) and Al71Cr24Fe5 (b) alloys in a form of plates after corrosion tests in 3.5% NaCl solution at 25 °C.

According to data from the work1, the Al–Cr–Fe alloys should be characterized by good corrosion resistance, especially with high proportions of Al and Cr. These elements are passivating and allow the formation of a protective layer against further corrosion. Furthermore, Ott et al.36 studied the polycrystalline γ-Al64.2Cr27.2Fe8.1 alloy. Based on results36, it was found that the addition of chromium is necessary for the stabilization of the passive layer. Therefore, the Cr2O3 was identified for the Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy with a higher chromium content, which positively influences the corrosion resistance.

Structural studies using ND, SEM–EDX, and TEM methods confirmed the presence of two phases for the Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy and multiple phases for Al71Cr24Fe5. Both alloys were characterized by the presence of the structurally complex alloy phase—Al65Cr27Fe8. The Al8Cr5 phase with γ-brass structure was identified for Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy in a form of ingot and plate.

The binary phase Al65Cr20Fe15 alloy showed a lower friction coefficient compared to the multiphase Al71Cr24Fe5. The values of the coefficient of friction were similar for the single-phase CMA alloys described in the literature when the air atmosphere during the pin-on-disc tests was altered.

The beneficial effect of the applied cooling rate on hardness was demonstrated for both chemical compositions. The binary phase Al65Cr20Fe5 alloy was characterized by higher hardness values compared to the multiphase Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy and the single phase Al–Cr–Fe alloy described in the literature.

The Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys studied showed paramagnetic properties. The Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy with an increase in the cooling rate of the liquid state showed an increase of the magnetic values.

The studied Al65Cr20Fe15 and Al71Cr24Fe5 alloys were characterized by the presence of passive oxide layers after electrochemical tests: Al65Cr20Fe15 (Al2O3) and Al71Cr24Fe5 (Al2O3 + Cr2O3). The higher intensity of oxides on the surface of Al71Cr24Fe5 alloy was recorded because of higher chromium content that stabilizes a passive layer.

The data and material generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ďuriška, L., Černičková, I., Priputen, P. & Palcut, M. Aqueous corrosion of aluminum-transition metal alloys composed of structurally complex phases: a review. Materials (Basel). 14, 1–28 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Dubois, J. M. & Belin-Ferré, E. Complex Metallic Alloys: Fundamentals and Applications (WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co, 2010).

Book Google Scholar

Dubois, J. M. An introduction to complex metallic alloys and to the CMA network of excellence. In Basics of Thermodynamics and Phase Transitions in Complex Intermetallics (ed. Belin-Ferré, E.) 1–29 (World Scientific, 2008).

Ura-Binczyk, E., Beni, A., Lewandowska, M. & Schmutz, P. Passive oxide film characterisation on Al–Cr–Fe and Al–Cu–Fe–Cr complex metallic alloys in neutral to alkaline electrolytes by photo- and electrochemical methods. Electrochim. Acta 139, 289–301 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dubois, J. M. Properties- and applications of quasicrystals and complex metallic alloys. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6760–6777 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ovchinnikov, A., Smetana, V. & Mudring, A. V. Metallic alloys at the edge of complexity: Structural aspects, chemical bonding and physical properties. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 1–26 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Mayou, D. & Trambly de Laissardière, G. Quantum transport in quasicrystals and complex metallic alloys. In Handbook of Metal Physics (eds. Fujiwara, T. & Ishii, Y.) Vol. 3 209–265 (Elsevier Science, 2007).

Beni, A. et al. Passivation and localised corrosion susceptibility of new Al–Cr–Fe complex metallic alloys in acidic NaCl electrolytes. Electrochim. Acta 56, 10524–10532 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dong, C. The δ-Al4Cu9 phase as an approximant of quasicrystals. Philos. Mag. A 73, 1519–1528 (1995).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Geng, X., Wen, B. & Fan, C. Crystal structure of the Al8Cr5 -type intermetallic Al7.85Cr5.16. IUCrData 5, x200422 (2020).

Ura-Binczyk, E. et al. Passivation of Al–Cr–Fe and Al–Cu–Fe–Cr complex metallic alloys in 1M H2SO4 and 1M NaOH solutions. Corros. Sci. 53, 1825–1837 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Demange, V., Ghanbaja, J., Machizaud, F. & Dubois, J. M. About γ-brass phases in the Al–Cr–Fe system and their relationships to quasicrystals and approximants. Philos. Mag. 85, 1261–1272 (2005).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Rank, M., Franke, P., Hoffmann, J. & Seifert, H. J. Experimental investigation of phase equilibria in the Al–Cr–Fe system. Calphad 66, 1–12 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Butler, T. M. & Weaver, M. L. Oxidation behavior of arc melted AlCoCrFeNi multi-component high-entropy alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 674, 229–244 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Massalski, T. B. The Al–Cu (Aluminum–Copper) system. Bull. Alloy Phase Diagrams 1, 27–33 (1980).

Article Google Scholar

Grushko, B., Kowalska-Strzęciwilk, E., Przepiórzyński, B. & Surowiec, M. Investigation of the Al–Cr γ-range. J. Alloys Compd. 402, 98–104 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Grushko, B. et al. Complex intermetallics in Al–Cu–Cr system. J. Alloys Compd. 442, 114–116 (2007).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Grushko, B., Kowalska-Strzęciwilk, E., Przepiórzyński, B. & Surowiec, M. An investigation of the Al–Cu–Cr phase diagram: Phase equilibria at 800–1000 °C. J. Alloys Compd. 417, 121–126 (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Veys, D. et al. Chemical surface ageing in ambient conditions of an Al–Fe–Cr approximant phase. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 19, 1–15 (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Młynarek-Żak, K. et al. Electrochemical characterization of rapidly solidified Al-(Cr, Cu, Ni, Y, Zr)-Fe alloys. Electrochim. Acta 409, 1–17 (2022).

Article Google Scholar

Khoruzha, V. G., Kornienko, K. E., Pavlyuchkov, D. V., Grushko, B. & Velikanova, T. Y. The Al–Cr–Fe phase diagram: I—Phase equilibria at subsolidus temperatures over composition range 58–100 at.% Al. Powder Metall. Met. Ceram. 50, 83–97 (2011).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cavalcante Guedes de Lima, D. et al. Indirect assessment of the surface energy of the Al–Cu–Fe quasicrystal. J. Mater. Sci. 51, 4070–4078 (2016).

Sordelet, D. J., Kim, J. S. & Besser, M. F. Dry sliding of polygrained quasicrystalline Al–Cu–Fe alloys. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 553, 459–470 (1999).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Wolf, W. et al. Wear and corrosion performance of Al–Cu–Fe–(Cr) quasicrystalline coatings produced by HVOF. J. Therm. Spray Technol. 29, 1195–1207 (2020).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Dubois, J. M. & Belin-Ferré, E. Friction and solid-solid adhesion on complex metallic alloys. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 15, 1–20 (2014).

Article Google Scholar

Dubois, J. M., Brunet, P., Costin, W. & Merstallinger, A. Friction and fretting on quasicrystals under vacuum. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 334–335, 475–480 (2004).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Li, N. & Yan, H. The effects of rare earth pr and heat treatment on the wear properties of AZ91 alloy. Curr. Comput. Aided Drug Des. 8, 1–13 (2018).

Google Scholar

Duckham, A., Shechtman, D. & Grushko, B. Influence of grain orientation on friction and wear behavior in quasicrystalline alloys. Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 643, 811–816 (2001).

Google Scholar

Dubois, J. M. Useful Quasicrystals. (World Scientific, 2003).

Klein, T., Berger, C., Mayou, D. & Cyrot-Lackmann, F. Proximity of a metal-insulator transition in icosahedral phases of high structural quality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 2907–2910 (1991).

Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Stadnik, Z. M. & Müller, F. Thermal, structural and magnetic properties of icosahedral Al86Cr8Fe6 alloy. Philos. Magn. B 71, 221–238 (1995).

Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Bihar, Ž et al. Magnetic, electrical and thermal transport properties of Al–Cr–Fe approximant phases. J. Alloys Compd. 407, 65–73 (2006).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Dolinšek, J. et al. Anisotropic electrical, magnetic and thermal transport properties of the Al80Cr15Fe5 decagonal approximant. Philos. Magn. 88, 2145–2153 (2008).

Article ADS Google Scholar

Carrillo, A., Daza, J., Saurina, J., Escoda, L. & Suñol, J. J. Structural, thermal and magnetic analysis of Fe75Co10Nb6B9 and Fe65Co20Nb6B9 nanostructured alloys. Materials (Basel). 14, 1–12 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Duchoslav, J., Arndt, M., Keppert, T., Luckeneder, G. & Stifter, D. XPS investigation on the surface chemistry of corrosion products on ZnMgAl-coated steel. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 7133–7144 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ott, N., Beni, A., Ulrich, A., Ludwig, C. & Schmutz, P. Flow microcapillary plasma mass spectrometry-based investigation of new Al–Cr–Fe complex metallic alloy passivation. Talanta 120, 230–238 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

The work was supported by the National Science Centre of Poland under research project no. 2018/29/B/ST8/02264 and the statutory subsidy of the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering of the Silesian University of Technology no. 10/010/BKM22/1107.

Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18a, 44-100, Gliwice, Poland

K. Młynarek-Żak, W. Pakieła, D. Łukowiec & R. Babilas

A. Chełkowski Institute of Physics, University of Silesia in Katowice, 75 Pułku Piechoty 1, 41-500, Chorzów, Poland

A. Bajorek

Department of Physics, Częstochowa University of Technology, Armii Krajowej 19, 42-200, Częstochowa, Poland

P. Gębara

Budapest Neutron Centre, Konkoly-Thege Miklos st. 29-33, Budapest, 1121, Hungary

A. Szakál & I. Dhiman

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

K.M-Ż. and R.B. developed the methodology and assumptions of the experiments. W.P. conducted and interpreted pin-on-disc and scanning electron microscopy studies. R.B. conducted the structural analysis using transmission electron microscopy. D.Ł. carried out HRTEM observations. A.B. conducted and interpreted XPS studies. P.G. carried out VSM tests. I.D. and A.S. conducted research and analysis with the use of neutron diffraction. K.M-Ż. conducted and interpreted Vickers hardness measurements. K.M-Ż. wrote the main manuscript text. R.B. was responsible for supervision over research works. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Correspondence to K. Młynarek-Żak or R. Babilas.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

Młynarek-Żak, K., Pakieła, W., Łukowiec, D. et al. Structure and selected properties of Al–Cr–Fe alloys with the presence of structurally complex alloy phases. Sci Rep 12, 14194 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17870-0

Download citation

Received: 29 May 2022

Accepted: 02 August 2022

Published: 20 August 2022

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17870-0

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering (2023)

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.